Ithaca Energy Inc. (TSX: IAE, LSE: IAE, FRA: I6T, OTC: IACAF)

Court of Queens Bench of Alberta, Court File No: 1501-05830

This securities class action relates to the Defendants publishing core documents and making other statements containing misrepresentations about Ithaca’s offshore oil and gas business and operations concerning: (1) material modifications to its “FPF-1” Floating Production Facility; and (2) corresponding 2015 pro forma production and revenue projections for the Greater Stella Area. The representative plaintiff, on behalf of the class of shareholders, served his motion record in support of leave to proceed on December 1, 2015.

On June 24, 2019, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta released its first decision relating to shareholders’ burden to seek “leave to proceed” with a statutory secondary market (a/k/a, open market purchase) claim against a responsible issuer.  The decision is identified as Stevens v. Ithaca Energy Inc., 2019 ABQB 474.

The investors argued that Ithaca Energy’s position directly violated the famous Supreme Court of Canada case of Kerr v. Daniel Leather Inc., 2007 SCC 44, at paragraphs 54 and 55, which was first followed in the context of a leave to proceed motion in Wong v. Pretium Resources Inc., 2017 ONSC 3361, at paragraphs 31 and 38.  Specifically, potential and the then current investors of Ithaca Energy should have been given all the then current material facts so they could make their own judgment about whether to accept or not management’s business judgment about the future outcome of the identified problems.

Equally as important for investors in providing a solid guidance as to what must be disclosed to investors, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta also followed Sharbern Holdings Inc. v. Vancouver Airport Centre Ltd, 2011 SCC 23, in determining when an adverse fact rises to a level of becoming a material fact requiring disclosure to investors.  That definition can be summarized as asking whether that omitted adverse fact, if disclosed, would have significantly altered the total mix of information made available to investors at that time of the released quarterly report or news release.

Ultimately, the Queen’s Bench of Alberta granted the investor’s application for leave to proceed and certified a class of investors that purchased Ithaca Energy’s securities between October 7, 2014 and February 25, 2015.  The proceeding should advanced towards discovery and trial.

Claim or Motion for Authorization issued: May 26, 2015

Certified Class Period: October 7, 2014 to and including February 25, 2015

Leave to Proceed Granted: June 24, 2019 

Shareholders’ Canadian Counsel: Andrew Morganti, Morganti & Co. and Gavin Price, Jensen Shawa Solomon Duguid Hawkes LLP

Shareholders’ Canadian Expert(s): EPEUS LLC and Compass Lexecon

Defendants’ Canadian Counsel: Perry Mack, Q.C., Peacock Linder Halt & Mack LLP